Animals should not be used for

Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings, unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings, unless there is evidence that the animals do not suffer in any way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? This discussion about whether or not animals should be used for the benefit of humans is a very controversial one.

Animals should not be used for

Discuss April Main article: Moral status of animals in the ancient world Aristotle argued that animals lacked reason logosand placed humans at the top of the natural world. Some animals were considered divine, e. The 21st-century debates about animals can be traced back to the savage stone age from horrible histories, and the idea of a divine hierarchy.

Full Site Search

In the Book of Genesis 1: Correlatively, the Bible forbids 'plowing with an ox and an ass together' Deut. According to the rabbinical tradition, this prohibition stems from the hardship that an ass would suffer by being compelled to keep up with an ox, which is, of course, far more powerful.

Similarly, one finds the prohibition against 'muzzling an ox when it treads out the grain' Deut. These ancient regulations, virtually forgotten, bespeak of an eloquent awareness of the status of animals as ends in themselves", a point also corroborated by Norm Phelps.

He was the first to create a taxonomy of animals; he perceived some similarities between humans and other species, but argued for the most part that animals lacked reason logosreasoning logismosthought dianoia, nousand belief doxa.

Animals should not be used for

CE in his Life of Cato the Elder comments that while law and justice are applicable strictly to men only, beneficence and charity towards beasts is characteristic of a gentle heart. This is intended as a correction and advance over the merely utilitarian treatment of animals and slaves by Cato himself.

Ryderthe first known animal protection legislation in Europe was passed in Ireland in It prohibited pulling wool off sheep, and the attaching of ploughs to horses' tails, referring to "the cruelty used to beasts.

Ward's list of "rites" included rite Kathleen Kete writes that animal welfare laws were passed in as part of the ordinances of the Protectorate —the government under Oliver Cromwell —which lasted from tofollowing the English Civil War.

Cromwell disliked blood sports, which included cockfightingcock throwingdog fightingbull baiting and bull running, said to tenderize the meat.

These could be seen in villages and fairgrounds, and became associated with idleness, drunkenness, and gambling. Kete writes that the Puritans interpreted the biblical dominion of man over animals to mean responsible stewardship, rather than ownership.

The Animals Don't. Life under the big top is not the "wholesome, fun-loving, educational experience" the circus industry would like you to think it is. For the animals, life is a monotonous and brutal routine of boredom, stress and pain. Oct 14,  · I feel that Animals should not be used in research if it can be avoided, and if it is going to cause them harm. When animals are used, I hope that the safety of the animals is of important to the researcher, just like when using human beings. 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish.

The opposition to blood sports became part of what was seen as Puritan interference in people's lives, and the animal protection laws were overturned during the Restorationwhen Charles II was returned to the throne in There are barbarians who seize this dog, who so greatly surpasses man in fidelity and friendship, and nail him down to a table and dissect him alive, to show you the mesaraic veins!

You discover in him all the same organs of feeling as in yourself.

Animals should not be used for

Answer me, mechanisthas Nature arranged all the springs of feeling in this animal to the end that he might not feel?Furthermore, science has developed the right strategies to investigate human diseases in animals and use the findings to develop medications that work in humans (and in animals as well, in the case of veterinary medicine) Not everything is smooth sailing, there are some big obstacles in translating discoveries made in animals to humans.

caninariojana.com These terms are used to describe animals that provide comfort just by being with a person. Because they have not been trained to perform a specific job or task, they do not qualify as service animals under the ADA.

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample 97 - Animals should not be used for the benefit of human beings

However, some State or local governments have laws that allow people to take emotional support animals into public places. Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings..

Its advocates oppose the assignment of moral value and fundamental protections on the basis of species membership alone. 95% of animals used in experiments are not protected by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA), which excludes birds, rats and mice bred for research, and cold-blooded animals such as reptiles and most fish.

Should Ban Testing Cosmetics on Animals. There are more effective, efficient and humane ways to be sure products are safe. By Jim Moran, Paul A. Locke on May 28, ; Share on Facebook.

This publication provides guidance on the term “service animal” and the service animal provisions in the Department’s new regulations.

Beginning on March 15, , only dogs are recognized as service animals under titles II and III of the ADA. A service animal is a dog that is individually.

Animal rights - Wikipedia